Is “sponsored” enough in Sweden?

The guidance wants a word a Swedish reader recognises instantly as advertising. Reklam and annons are the safe ones. Sponsrat is common and weaker: it says something happened, not that the post is marketing.

The brand only sent a gift. Do I still mark it?

If the brand expects a post, yes. A product sent to be shown is marketing in both countries. Mark it as reklam and name the brand.

I use the platform’s paid-partnership label. Isn’t that enough?

It helps, and it is not the whole job. The guidance wants the marking where the reader reads: in the caption or on the image, in the local language, first. Keep both.

What about Stories and video?

Every frame, the whole clip. A marker in the first Story frame that is gone by the third does not cover the third. This tool reads captions; it cannot see video, so treat a clear caption as one of two checks, not the last one.

Does this cover Denmark and Finland?

Not yet. The principle is the same there, the wording and the authorities are not. Sweden and Norway first; the other two follow once their rule sets have had a proper read.

Free tool · Compliance

Is this post marked?

Paste the caption and pick the market. You will see whether a reader in Sweden or Norway would know it is advertising, and get the line that fixes it.

Wrong language.

Something is there, but not a word the guidance recognises as clear for this audience.

No clear advertising marker foundAdd “Reklam för Nordkaffe” so the post reads as marketing at a glance.
Only in English: “ad”“ad” on its own is not treated as clear for a Swedish-speaking audience. Use “Reklam”.
Buried in the hashtags at the endMove the marker to the first line. A marker after “read more”, or among the closing hashtags, is not considered clear.
Names the advertiser: NordkaffeReaders can tell who is paying, not just that someone is.

The fix

Reklam för Nordkaffe Ny morgonrutin ☕️ Har testat den nya bryggaren i två veckor nu och den har verkligen ändrat hur jag startar dagen. Länk i bion om ni vill spana! #kaffe #morgonrutin #hemma #ad #samarbete #nordkaffe

This reads the caption only. Video, voice-over and Story frames need their own marking, visible for the whole clip.

Talk to a strategist → Add this to a brief

Not legal advice. It reads the caption the way the published guidance says a reader should be able to. The guidance is the source; when it changes, so will this.

Why this matters

The ninth hashtag is not a disclosure.

Both countries say the same thing: a reader must be able to tell that a post is marketing, straight away, without work. Konsumentverket in Sweden and Forbrukertilsynet in Norway have each published guidance for social media, and the failures they describe repeat: an English “ad” on a Swedish post, a marker at the end after “read more”, a Story marked in the first frame and not the second, a creator who thought “samarbete” covered it.

The part brands miss is that the advertiser is liable too. When a post is not marked, the letter goes to the company as well as the creator. So the marking belongs in the brief, with the exact words and where they go, and it gets checked before the post is live.

This check does the reading for you. It looks for a word the guidance treats as clear, in the right language, on the first line, with the brand named. What it cannot do is watch the video. That part is still on you.

Sweden

Clear: reklam · annons · betalt samarbete · betalt partnerskap · i samarbete med
Weaker: sponsrat · sponsrad · spons · gåva · pr-gåva · pr gåva
Where: First line, before “read more”. Every Story frame. The whole video.
Who: Konsumentverket under marknadsföringslagen

Norway

Clear: reklame · annonse · betalt samarbeid · betalt partnerskap · i samarbeid med
Weaker: sponset · sponsa · spons · gave · pr-gave · pr gave
Where: First line, before “read more”. Every Story frame. The whole video.
Who: Forbrukertilsynet under markedsføringsloven

Read the guidance itself: Konsumentverket, vägledning om marknadsföring i sociala medier; Forbrukertilsynet, veiledning om merking av reklame i sosiale medier. Rules move. The authorities are the source, not this page.

Before you post

Questions people ask us.

Is “sponsored” enough in Sweden?: The guidance wants a word a Swedish reader recognises instantly as advertising. Reklam and annons are the safe ones. Sponsrat is common and weaker: it says something happened, not that the post is marketing.
The brand only sent a gift. Do I still mark it?: If the brand expects a post, yes. A product sent to be shown is marketing in both countries. Mark it as reklam and name the brand.
I use the platform’s paid-partnership label. Isn’t that enough?: It helps, and it is not the whole job. The guidance wants the marking where the reader reads: in the caption or on the image, in the local language, first. Keep both.
What about Stories and video?: Every frame, the whole clip. A marker in the first Story frame that is gone by the third does not cover the third. This tool reads captions; it cannot see video, so treat a clear caption as one of two checks, not the last one.
Who gets in trouble, the creator or the brand?: Both. The laws are written for the advertiser first. That is why the marking belongs in the brief, with the exact words and the placement, and gets checked before the post goes live.
Does this cover Denmark and Finland?: Not yet. The principle is the same there, the wording and the authorities are not. Sweden and Norway first; the other two follow once their rule sets have had a proper read.

Write it into the brief.

Marking is the cheapest line in a campaign and the most expensive one to forget. Tell us the market and every creator’s brief carries the words, the placement and the check.

Talk to a strategist → Try the Rights Builder